Obama's surrogates should start going into full-throttle attack mode.   She, Bill, Carville, Stepha-hair-poulous, McAuliffe, and the rest of her entourage need to be totally obliterated politically for what they're doing right now.   Obliterated politically, so that they never, ever can claim an ounce of credibility again.   No leverage for her in Denver.   No future campaigns.  

She's not going to go down gracefully, and if Obama and/or his surrogates let her down softly, and accept her forgivingly, she'll continually turn the knife in his back thereafter; and she won't go away; and her spiteful voting block can go screw.   Get the howitzers out, and start blowing the freakin' stuffing out of her campaign.

-N.B.

in an interview to the Times after South Carolina. They didn't listen. I am glad he is calling them on their despicable behavior.

I've been knocking on doors for Obama in New Hampshire, New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and Pennsylvania   since January. In that time, I have witnessed the steady erosion of AA support for the Clintons.

In the beginning, up in Harlem, I heard good things from voters there about Hillary. No more. And in PA last weekend, the anger in the AA community at the Clintons was really palpable. One woman told me she felt duped by the Cintons. It's a rare day indeed when I hear anyone in the AA community speak well of Bill and Hillary. And I don't think they would ever vote for her now.

Now that Clyburn has spoken, watch for others to come out and criticize the Clintons.

2 thigns: I'm GLAD Clyburn is speaking out, but the fact that he is speaking out as AA tends to put BHO in the race corner where they want him.  GORE, and others , WHRERE ARE YOU (I thought for the first time yesterday that Gore is sitting it out because he still thinks he has a chance to get this himself...)  Secondly, I serioudlou doubt HRC would think she has a chance in 2012; the Clinton, INC group (DLC) would rather lose against McCain than have the upstart (who does not owe any one a thing) shake up the power structure of the party.  At our expense, forget the court, forget possible Iran conflict, forget health care - this is about control of "THEIR" party....  

for this reason at any cost!!!

And she's not stupid.

She knows exactly what she's doing. She is poison now.
She will remain poison in the future.  I have more oontempt for her than I hold for Bush. The venom and hatefulness shown by many of her supporters comes straight from the top. Hillary Rodham Clinton will not be President now or ever.

I used to love Hillary but even before she decided to run for POTUS my love started to sour.  Her votes on Iraq and the bankruptcy bill were nails in the coffin.  
She is just pitiful now.  But what is really upsetting is the number of surrogates that are out on the talk show circuit doing mental gymnastics to try and weave a positive narrative of her and her current situation.  It is just pitiful and embarrassing. I have lost respect for people like Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.  If they choose to spout the ....MI and FL votes should count but caucus states don't .... then they are just as full of shit as she is. I guess I am upset that so many people who I used to respect have such maliable values.

But how many will be around in another 4 years?

I sure as hell will not forget.

cannot win without them. She has dug her own grave, and I for one am ready to push her into it. Good reddins to bad rubbish. And even though the US media is letting her get away with her new world wide foreign policy statement: Nuke the Hell out of them, our allies and the rest of the NATO and people in the Mid-East are livid about this insane and irresponsible behavior on her part. No other political or government official has ever used this kind of language regarding using nuclear warfare. I am truly disgusted that the media is has not (once again) done their job by calling her out on this monumental gaff. Imagine if Obama had made such a statement.

Her thought presumes a certain control of mass media, which might "forget."  

But, the net has changed that equation for information dispersal and the once near-exclusive relationship with the voting public. Not only can large groups remember, they can retain every shred of evidence of most any media. And, they amplify and project it.

Once she went to Melon-Scaife, I, for one, would never think her motives are exclusively her own from that point on.

and we've got the Net which is in effect, a gigantic archive of news articles and videos and people's experiences. That's how she got tripped up on "SNIPER FIRE!!!"

done that she likely won't get the solid support she needs from anyone. Consider that that was a key argument made here in 2005 and 2006 against Senator Kerry. Even after people said they knew he was a man of integrity and that they agreed with his positions, some questioned if he could win and called that campaign bad.

In actuality, his PRIMARY campaign, the only thing that Clinton has yet done was very well won. He then nearly beat a sitting wartime President even with a media blatantly against him on the strength of his debates and an uplifting convention.

If Kerry, who ran a high minded, principled campaign and who was pretty scandal free and had the positions that became the positions of all the Democratic candidates couldn't get support - how does Hillary, who has run a campaign that the wheels have been flying off of, that is nasty and who has destroyed her own reputation. She is seen as dishonest and untrustworthy by a majority of people. Many are people who admired her as First Lady and afterwards.   It is even harder to win back trust that you had once it is gone. The Bill Clinton card is similarly damaged.

Considering two things - that by November, most people thought of Kerry as someone we could be proud of, a classy guy, brilliant in the debates and with no real scandals or major character flaws exposed by hundreds of millions of dollars of ads. At most, there was a political miscalculation on how to fight. Yet, that was enough to prevent many people from getting behind him.

Consider that no one could say that HRC ran a classy campaign. She was less consistent on issues than Kerry and nowhere near as honest. She has been caught in lies that will likely be remembered after the campaign. It will also be interesting to see what her influence in the Senate will be given the diminished value of Bill Clinton and the fact that she likely won't be looked on as a future President.