The wording of the last four paragraphs of the widely circulated article from The Hill, which are seen in several follow up articles including the one at businesswire.com datelined from Detroit which also uses the Hill article.

Piggy Limbaugh was quick to use the request for recount as a tool to smear Hillary amd infer that Kucinich's support for Obama in Iowa would be insturmental in a New Hampshire win.

So, let's look.  article from Election Defense Alliance.  hat tip to Bradblog

R talking point, "Clinton Cheated and can't be trusted."

A simple article from whatreallyhappened leads back to this article again from, Brad Friedman which in turn turned up at Freeperville[I refuse to link to such filth] as unquestioned proof positive that not only Clinton but now Democrats in general had rigged the NH primary, and they in turn use Democrats dot com as a source!...the story starts to grow like Rabbi Akiba's Golem.

R talking point, "Democrats rigged the election and can't be trusted."

Kucinich is viewed as a fruitcake and "garden gnome" at Freeperville, but that is not important, and really not accurate at all.  What is important is that a request to recount was been twisted by knaves, and given Dennis's own questioning of results vs polls and his own ill-advised vocal backing for Senator Obama in Iowa which looked like a "kingmaker" gambit, has fed our opponents, brought suspicion upon Senator Clinton for vote tampering in spite of the wretched Diebold, now Premier machinery, and even though Obama would require at least 5 to 6 percentage points victory to stifle and "comeback" talk from the Clinton camp, this recount for all its talk of higher purpose looks like a smear of Senator clinton by a vocal, on the record, candiate who has already tried to play "kingmaker" for Obama.

R Talking Point?  "divided Dems fight among themselves, and how can they be trusted?"  We have already seen this, it's been front paged here I think within the last few days.