View Story | 916 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
We need to verify that the votes are counted correctly, no matter who wins.
Defeat John McCain - John McCaingry.com
by AnotherMassachusettsLiberal on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 06:20:33 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
and it is good someone in the Party stood up and made sure that we didn't just roll over again and again on this issue.
Grandpa is mean and he smells funny.
by MadAsHellMaddie on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 07:35:59 AM PDT
because it put to rest an ugly rumor by people trying to slime HRC.
by roadhaus on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 09:07:08 AM PDT
She slimes herself with who she picks for her high-level campaign staff.
Too bad most rank & file Democrats aren't clued in enough to know.
Democracy is a contact sport...
by jsmagid on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 10:19:36 AM PDT
The recount was important because the integrity of our elections is at stake. I don't give a flying crap who wins New Hampshire. (I'm an Iowan. I already caucused. Who wins NH is academic to me.) I do care that whoever is declared the winner actually won. To put it another way, I care that our elections are being conducted cleanly and fairly. This recount could have proven that was the case.
Instead, the recount is proving we have real reason to be afraid. There are people who's votes are not being counted. This concerns all of us. Next time, it could be my vote, or yours, that isn't counted. Our power is being taken away from us, and if we aren't willing to fight for it, we won't get it back.
And that stupid rumor that you mention could have been easily quashed if there were mandatory audits and recounts (of a statically representative sample) to ensure the integrity of the election. Thank $DIETY at least there was a voter-verified paper trail. Instead, we had to suffer through a week of petty bickering by children who were more concerned with their pet candidates (or trashing others') than they were with the very process we use as our one direct means of exercising our power.
-8.62, -8.05 | Feedback
by FOS on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 11:32:06 AM PDT
by roadhaus on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 11:59:39 AM PDT
Who else would use $DEITY as a substitution variable, and who else would misspell it?
by Cobbler on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 01:25:04 PM PDT
I don't write software, but I tend to read way too much slashdot, and I'm fairly computer literate (I think). $DEITY was the first method that popped to mind for the obvious purpose, and when I transposed the E and I, Firefox's spell checker must have caught it (I just tried it out), but I obviously ignored it.
Ah well. What's a pseudonymous poster to do?
by FOS on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 02:13:52 PM PDT
That would seem to be the point.
Evolution is an incremental project.
by Common Cents on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 11:22:10 AM PDT
on wall which you wave you hand in front of and a paper ballot rolls out. You wipe your hands on the soft paper and toss it into the container below the box. This sound a lot like the new paper towel dispensers. The similarities are profound for no one is really going to count you ballot and it will be consider trash, anyway.
by drmah on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 08:41:49 AM PDT
so soft to the touch. Gentle on the rear. Then you flush it down the toilet.
(-7, -4.62) I'd rather vote for something I want and not get it than vote for something I don't want and get it. -Eugene V. Debs
by Cheney on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 09:39:11 AM PDT
wide narrow
View Story | 916 comments